The Existence of God
While I prefer to use original material in
our bulletin I occasionally come across items I want to share with
everyone. This is such an occasion. Brad Harrub has written a series of
articles on the existence of God and over the next few weeks I will be
sharing those with you in this space—In His love, Thomas.
Any logical person would be hard pressed to
defend that nothing exists today. The very fact that you are reading this
article indicates that something exists. (Some might contend that this is
all a hallucination—but I would still ask where did the hallucination come
from, and exactly how do you know it is a hallucination? In order for
something to be a hallucination indicates that you can know reality.) Since
it is an absolute truth that something now exists, it demands that
something has existed forever. Otherwise, one would be forced to
argue that something came from nothing—a position that is weak and
illogical. It is a self-evident truth that something can’t come from
nothing, thus something has to have existed forever. This truth does not
prove a Supreme Being, but rather it establishes that something has
“eternal” properties. The essence of being eternal can be
defined as existing without a beginning or end—sometimes considered to be
outside of time. Since something exists today it is a reasonable scientific
observation to then go one step further and deduce that something has
existed forever.
But how do we go about identifying that
eternal “something”? This is where naturalistic science meets philosophy.
All of our scientific observations exclude anything being “eternal” in
nature. Everything in which man is currently aware of obeys the Second Law
of Thermodynamics, which states that things are running down and wearing out
(a concept also shared by writers of the Bible; see Hebrew 1:11; Isaiah
51:6; Psalm 102:26). Eternality would indicate that something is not running
down and had no beginning. Consider the following equations:
1. Something Exists Today—THUS—Something
Must Be Eternal and Has Always Existed
2. Something is Eternal (Doesn’t Wear
Down and was not created)—THUS—Something Violates Scientific Laws
(specifically the Second Law of Thermodynamics)
3. Something Violates Scientific
Laws—THUS—Something exists outside the observable laws of
naturalistic science
From this we can conclude:
4. Something eternal
is THUS outside the observable laws of naturalistic science!
While many may not like this
“math,” it is inescapable. To argue otherwise would be to deny our very
existence. We can logically conclude that something has existed
forever—something that is not explainable by naturalistic science. Over the
next few weeks we want to examine Who (or what) that something is.
Thomas Sneed
Pond Church of Christ