Home
Directions
Ministry
Elders
Deacons
Missions
Youth Ministries
Congregational News
Minutes of Meditation
About The Church
Activities in the Brotherhood
Bible Corres. Courses
Pond Ladies Activities
Bible Class
Links
Photos

 

 

 

 

Email Us

 

Schedule of Services
Sun Bible Classes 9:00am
Morning Worship 10:00am
Evening Worship 6:00pm
Wed Night Worship 7:00pm

Phone:
(615)441-0024
 
Back to Minutes of Meditation

Below is the latest installment of Brad Harrub’s series on the existence of God.

 

Enjoy,

Thomas

 

We have proven that “something” has eternal properties, but was that “something” responsible for the creation of the universe? Was that “something” responsible for the creation of man?

Within science there is a hierarchy that has been built upon knowledge. Scientists commonly offer hypotheses or postulate about what they expect to observe in various research studies. From their observations they offer theories about how things will behave. At the pinnacle of this hierarchy are scientific laws. Scientific laws differ from hypotheses and theories in that they are empirically determined to be constant—never violated. One such scientific law is the Law of Cause and Effect. The Law of Cause and Effect recognizes that for every material effect there must be an adequate cause that existed prior to the effect.

There has never been a known exception to this law (otherwise, it would immediately lose its status as a scientific law). No one would ever believe that a mole dug the majestic Grand Canyon. Anyone who has viewed the canyon firsthand would recognize the foolishness of such a suggestion. This cause (the mole) is insufficient to explain the effect (the Grand Canyon). One can easily surmise that a bigger cause must be responsible for the canyon. As such, we can rationally apply this scientific law to the universe. We know an enormous and complex universe exists today, so what caused it? Consider how big a cause would be required to make that kind of effect. Truly we can conclude that something massive (a Supreme Force or Being) was needed to cause the Universe. In later chapters we will identify characteristics of this Supreme Being. For now, it is sufficient to conclude that the evidence demonstrates that something is out there, and has been for eternity.

Skeptics might be quick to question: “O.K., then what caused God?” Take a closer look at this scientific law of cause and effect. It states that for every material effect there must be an adequate cause. The Bible describes God as a spirit (John 4:24), and thus this law would not apply to Him. This entire line of argument—frequently used by atheists such as Richard Dawkins—is an argument of infinite regression. Should someone offer “X” as an explanation for where God came from, the next logical question would be where did “X” come from. This line of questioning would then go on forever, until the skeptic comprehends the concept of eternality. Just because a scientist cannot grasp eternality doesn’t mean that God does not exist. It simply reveals that the scientist has not come to terms with the fact that matter exists today and it had to come from something. Plainly put something has to have eternal characteristics.

The evidence is adding up for the existence of a Supreme Being—a Being that is outside the normal scope of scientific measurements—a Being that should change the very way we conduct our lives. In chapter two we look at several ways we can prove there is a God. Once you have evaluated the evidence for the existence of an eternal Supreme Being, one is better equipped to answer those nagging questions of life.

 


 
 
Copyright © 2005 Pond Church of Christ