|
Home
Directions
Ministry
Elders
Deacons
Missions
Youth Ministries
Congregational News
Minutes of Meditation
About The Church
Activities in the Brotherhood
Bible Corres. Courses
Pond Ladies Activities
Bible Class
Links
Photos
Email Us
Schedule of Services
| Sun Bible Classes |
9:00am |
| Morning Worship |
10:00am |
| Evening Worship |
6:00pm |
| Wed Night Worship |
7:00pm |
|

Below is the latest
installment of Brad Harrub’s series on the existence of God.
Enjoy,
Thomas
We have proven that “something” has eternal
properties, but was that “something” responsible for the creation of the
universe? Was that “something” responsible for the creation of man?
Within science there is a hierarchy that has
been built upon knowledge. Scientists commonly offer hypotheses or postulate
about what they expect to observe in various research studies. From their
observations they offer theories about how things will behave. At the
pinnacle of this hierarchy are scientific laws. Scientific laws differ from
hypotheses and theories in that they are empirically determined to be
constant—never violated. One such scientific law is the Law of Cause and
Effect. The Law of Cause and Effect recognizes that for every material
effect there must be an adequate cause that existed prior to the effect.
There has never been a known exception to
this law (otherwise, it would immediately lose its status as a scientific
law). No one would ever believe that a mole dug the majestic Grand Canyon.
Anyone who has viewed the canyon firsthand would recognize the foolishness
of such a suggestion. This cause (the mole) is insufficient to explain the
effect (the Grand Canyon). One can easily surmise that a bigger cause must
be responsible for the canyon. As such, we can rationally apply this
scientific law to the universe. We know an enormous and complex universe
exists today, so what caused it? Consider how big a cause would be required
to make that kind of effect. Truly we can conclude that something massive (a
Supreme Force or Being) was needed to cause the Universe. In later chapters
we will identify characteristics of this Supreme Being. For now, it is
sufficient to conclude that the evidence demonstrates that something is out
there, and has been for eternity.
Skeptics might be quick to question: “O.K.,
then what caused God?” Take a closer look at this scientific law of cause
and effect. It states that for every material effect there must be an
adequate cause. The Bible describes God as a spirit (John 4:24), and thus
this law would not apply to Him. This entire line of argument—frequently
used by atheists such as Richard Dawkins—is an argument of infinite
regression. Should someone offer “X” as an explanation for where God came
from, the next logical question would be where did “X” come from. This line
of questioning would then go on forever, until the skeptic comprehends the
concept of eternality. Just because a scientist cannot grasp eternality
doesn’t mean that God does not exist. It simply reveals that the scientist
has not come to terms with the fact that matter exists today and it had to
come from something. Plainly put something has to have eternal
characteristics.
The evidence is adding up for the existence
of a Supreme Being—a Being that is outside the normal scope of scientific
measurements—a Being that should change the very way we conduct our
lives. In chapter two we look at several ways we can prove there is a
God. Once you have evaluated the evidence for the existence of an eternal
Supreme Being, one is better equipped to answer those nagging questions of
life.
|
|
|